Demystifying Hedge Funds: An Analysis of Distressed Debt Trades and Alpha
December 2010
This paper examines distressed debt investing and presents a systematic, trade-based way to capture the return of a core distressed strategy: buying the debt of companies that have defaulted or filed for bankruptcy protection. Traditional holders are often forced to sell below-investment-grade or defaulted securities, which can push prices well below fair value and create an opportunity for investors able to hold through a restructuring. The upside comes as the debt appreciates toward or above par, or converts to equity. The analysis builds a long-only simulated portfolio of defaulted bonds and loans and studies how it behaves across market cycles. Because the return depends mainly on company-specific restructuring rather than broad market direction, performance tends to be more idiosyncratic than equities or high yield, which can offer diversification benefits. Because the portfolio is founded on explicit rules, it is transparent by construction, avoids style drift, and can be managed with controlled risk and leverage. The paper is written for institutional allocators, OCIOs, and consultants evaluating distressed and event-driven credit, and it frames its conclusions as analytical perspective grounded in a long historical simulation.
What This Paper Examines
- How distressed debt generates returns, and why performance tends to be more idiosyncratic than equities or high yield.
- The structural sources of return, including forced selling by constrained holders and the upside from a successful restructuring.
- How the opportunity set varies with the business cycle and with corporate default rates.
- Whether a transparent, rules-based portfolio of defaulted debt can capture the distressed strategy.
- How reported hedge fund performance and index proxies compare, and the biases an allocator should weigh.
Key Findings
- Distressed debt returns are driven mainly by corporate restructuring, not by broad market direction. Credit market conditions affect the prices of defaulted securities, but the primary driver of return is the company-specific restructuring process. As a result, performance tends to be more idiosyncratic than equities or high yield, which is where the diversification benefit comes from.
- The opportunity set is cyclical, and returns tend to be strongest after default rates have peaked. The supply of defaulted debt expands during recessions as more companies fall into distress. The evidence suggests investors should consider an allocation particularly when default rates have peaked and the opportunity set is large.
- Two structural forces support the return. Forced selling by constrained holders, such as insurers, pension funds, and mandate-limited vehicles, can depress prices below fair value at the time of default. Debt bought at a deep discount then behaves like a call option on the company’s recovery, offering upside when a restructuring succeeds.
- A transparent, rules-based portfolio can capture much of the strategy while avoiding style drift. Building the exposure from explicit rules helps demystify the strategy, eliminates style drift, and lets an investor control risk and leverage. It also allows independent valuation, in contrast to distressed hedge fund holdings, which tend to be opaque and harder to value.
- Reported hedge fund performance and broad credit indices are imperfect lenses on the strategy. Indices built from reported hedge fund returns can carry survivorship bias and selective reporting, for example through side pockets. High yield proxies corporate credit conditions but is not a substitute for the restructuring-driven return that defines distressed investing.
The Authors
This paper is part of the long lineage of quantitative research that Versor’s founders began earlier in their careers and continue to build on at the firm today.
Deepak Gurnani, Founder and Chief Investment Officer
Deepak Gurnani is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Versor Investments. Deepak has three decades of experience in applying quantitative methods to uncover alpha across global equity markets. Over the past decade, he has focused on pioneering the use of AI and alternative data in equity investing.
Ludger Hentschel, Founding Partner, Investment Advisor
Ludger Hentschel joined Versor Investments as a Founding Partner and is based in New York. Ludger has over 20 years of experience in quantitative research and investing.
Versor’s founders co-authored this research with Dimitri Paliouras, colleagues at the firm where this work was originally conducted.
Disclaimer: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any type with respect to any securities or financial products.
Methodology: The analysis draws on a database of corporate bond and loan defaults covering US and international companies, using Moody’s Default Risk Service for default and resolution events, LoanX and LPC for loans, and multiple bond price sources, including IDC, Markit, Moody’s, and Altman/NYU, combined into a single price history for each security. The default sample spans the late 1980s onward, and the portfolio performance analysis covers the period from 1990 to 2009.
The method is systematic and rules-based. The study forms a long-only simulated portfolio of defaulted bonds and loans, rebalanced monthly, that adds companies after a default event and removes them at resolution. Securities are weighted by market value subject to concentration limits on any single issuer and any single sector, with the portfolio allowed to hold cash when defaults are scarce. The universe filters out very small issues, non-corporate defaults, debtor-in-possession loans, and similar exclusions, and the return calculation generally excludes debt-to-equity conversions, which makes the estimates conservative. Results are compared against high yield indices, a reported hedge fund distressed index, and other defaulted-debt indices, with a serial-correlation adjustment applied to account for stale pricing.
Request Access
Disclosures
Each report prepared by Versor Investments LP (formerly “ARP Investments” herein after referred to as “Versor Investments”) and available on this site is for informational and educational purposes only, is not intended to be relied on as a forecast, research or investment advice, and does not constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Reliance on information in this material is at the sole risk and discretion of the reader.
No information set forth on this site constitutes a prospectus, private placement memorandum or offering circular or otherwise constitutes an offer to sell, or solicitation of any offer to buy, any securities or other investments. References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be and should not be interpreted as recommendations. From time to time, Versor Investments may, along with Versor Investments’ clients and/or investors, hold direct or indirect positions or have exposure to securities, asset classes and financial markets referred to in a report on this site.
Offering materials relating to investments in entities managed by Versor Investments are not available to the general public. Investment funds managed by Versor Investments are available for subscription only on the basis of the relevant prospectus or confidential private placement memorandum, which is available only to investors satisfying the applicable eligibility criteria for investment.
The information set forth on this site is not intended to provide or to constitute investment, accounting, legal or tax advice. Versor Investments’ reports do not contain information that an investor should consider, evaluate or rely on with respect to the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular sector, geographic region, security, portfolio of securities, commodity, portfolio of commodities, currency or portfolio of currencies, transaction, investment strategy or other matter. No report set forth on this site was prepared in reference to the specific investment needs, objectives or risk tolerances of any investor or client. The views expressed in a report reflect significant assumptions and subjective judgments of Versor Investments as of the date of the report, are subject to change without prior notification and may not be updated.
Certain information has been provided by third-party sources, and while Versor Investments believes that information to be reliable, Versor Investments has not independently verified such information. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by Versor Investments, its officers, employees or agents.
This site may contain “forward looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass.
The information is not intended to be, nor shall it be construed as, investment advice or a recommendation of any kind. Before making any investment, prospective investors should consult their investment professionals, carefully review the risk factors and other terms disclosed in the relevant offering materials and related information and rely solely on such offering materials and related information in making any investment decision.
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. COMMODITY INTEREST TRADING INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS.